<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">toxreview</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Токсикологический вестник</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Toxicological Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-7922</issn><issn pub-type="epub">3034-4611</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36946/0869-7922-2021-29-4-4-13</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">toxreview-476</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЗОРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REVIEWS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>К процедуре подтверждения компетентности лаборатории, проводящей исследования на мутагенность с использованием теста Эймса</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>To the procedure of confirmation of the laboratory’s competence in performing mutagenicity assessment using the Ames test</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-8771</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Егорова</surname><given-names>Ольга Валерьевна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Egorova</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кандидат биол. наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела генетической токсикологии, ФБУН «ФНЦГ им. Ф.Ф. Эрисмана» Федеральной службы по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека, 141014, г. МытищиМосковской области.</p><p>e-mail: egorovaov@fferisman.ru</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Senior researcher of the department of genetic toxicology, FBES “F.F. Erisman Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, 141014, Mytishchi, Russia.</p><p>e-mail: egorovaov@fferisman.ru</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">egorovaov@fferisman.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФБУН «Федеральный научный центр гигиены им. Ф.Ф. Эрисмана» Федеральной службы по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>FBES “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Егорова О.В., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Егорова О.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Egorova O.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.toxreview.ru/jour/article/view/476">https://www.toxreview.ru/jour/article/view/476</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Тест на индукцию обратных генных мутаций (тест Эймса, руководство ОЭСР* № 471) – один из наиболее востребованных методов оценки мутагенности в виду простоты исполнения и способности выявлять до 70–80% веществ, обладающих канцерогенной активностью. Протокол эксперимента требует минимального количества тестируемого вещества и стандартного оборудования микробиологической лаборатории. Для получения первичных данных необходимо несколько дней от начала эксперимента. Несмотря на наличие публикаций, посвящённых детальному описанию стандартного протокола теста Эймса, существует пробел, затрагивающий ряд аспектов процедуры подтверждения компетентности испытательного центра, использующего в своей практике данный метод.</p></sec><sec><title>Материал и методы</title><p>Материал и методы. При подготовке данной статьи использовали литературные данные, опубликованные в отечественной и зарубежной литературе за последние 20 лет, касающиеся экспериментальных подходов при реализации теста Эймса. Поиск литературы проводили в базах данных Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, РИНЦ.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Во ФБУН «ФНЦГ им. Ф.Ф. Эрисмана» Роспотребнадзора метод оценки обратных генных мутаций на бактериях нашёл применение при оценке безопасности технических продуктов пестицидов, их смесей и препаративных форм, а также экспертизы эквивалентности. Испытательный лабораторный центр на базе ФБУН «ФНЦГ им. Ф.Ф. Эрисмана» Роспотребнадзора аккредитован на соответствие стандарту ГОСТ ISO/IEC 17025-2019 «Общие требования к компетентности испытательных и калибровочных лабораторий». В настоящей статье, основываясь на новых опубликованных данных и собственном практическом опыте, рассматривается ряд необходимых условий для демонстрации компетентности испытательной лаборатории, использующей в своей практике тест на индукцию обратных генных мутаций, ее способности получать достоверные результаты и осуществлять действия по управлению рисками лабораторной деятельности. Основное внимание уделено обеспечению таких параметров качества теста, как индикаторные культуры, система метаболической активации, контроль фона спонтанного мутирования и др.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Обсуждаемые практические вопросы могут быть полезны специалистам научно-исследовательских лабораторий, планирующим внедрение этого метода в практику.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. The bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames test, OECD* guideline No. 471) is one of the most popular methods for assessing mutagenicity due to its ease of use and the ability to detect up to 70–80% of substances with carcinogenic activity. The experimental protocol requires a minimum amount of test item and standard microbiological laboratory equipment. To obtain the raw data, several days from the start of the experiment are required.</p><p>Despite the existence of publications devoted to the detailed description of the standard Ames test protocol, there is a gap in a number of aspects of the procedure for confirming the competence of a test facility using this method in its practice.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. When preparing this article, we used the literature data published in Russian and foreign literature over the past 20 years concerning experimental approaches to the implementation of the Ames test. The literature search was carried out in the Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, RSCI databases.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. In the FBES “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing the bacterial mutation assay has found application in studying the safety of technical grade active ingredients of pesticides, their mixtures and formulation, as well as in the assessment of equivalence. The test facility on the basis of the FBES “Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing is accredited for compliance with the state standard GOST ISO / IEC 17025-2019” General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. “In this article, based on new published data and our own practical experience, a number of necessary conditions are considered for demonstrating the competence of a testing laboratory using the Ames test in its practice, its ability to obtain reliable results and take actions to manage the risks of laboratory activities. The main attention is paid to ensuring such parameters of the test quality as indicator cultures, metabolic activation system, control of the background of spontaneous mutation, etc.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. The discussed practical issues can be useful for specialists from research laboratories planning to introduce this method into practice.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>оценка мутагенности</kwd><kwd>тест Эймса</kwd><kwd>обратные генные мутации</kwd><kwd>руководство ОЭСР № 471</kwd><kwd>подтверждение компетентности</kwd><kwd>качество исследований</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>assessment of mutagenicity</kwd><kwd>Ames test</kwd><kwd>reverse gene mutations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абилев С.К., Глазер В.М. Мутагенез с основами генотоксикологии: учебное пособие. М.: СПб; Нестор-История: 2015</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abilev S., Glazer V. Mutagenesis with the basic principles of genotoxicology: a tutorial [Mutagenez s osnovami genotoksikologii: uchebnoe posobie]. Moscow-SPb.: Nestor-Istoriya; 2015 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeiger E. The test that changed the world: The Ames test and the regulation of chemicals. Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2019; 841: 43-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeiger E. The test that changed the world: The Ames test and the regulation of chemicals. Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2019; 841: 43-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD Test No. 471: Bacterial reverse mutation test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. 2020. Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264071247-en</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD Test No. 471: Bacterial reverse mutation test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. 2020. Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264071247-en</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ракитский В.Н., Ревазова Ю.А., Илюшина Н.А. Стратегия и тактика оценки мутагенности пестицидов. Токсикологический вестник. 2015; 134(5): 10-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rakitskiy V., Revazova Yu., Ilyushina N. Strategy and tactics of the pesticide mutagenicity assessment. Toksikologicheskiy vestnik. 2015; 134(5): 10-3. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Egorova O., Ilyushina N., Rakitskii V. Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticide analogs using standard and 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation tests. Toxicology in Vitro. 2020; 69:105006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova O., Ilyushina N., Rakitskii V. Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticide analogs using standard and 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation tests. Toxicology in Vitro. 2020; 69:105006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егорова О.В., Илюшина Н.А., Аверьянова Н.С., Масальцев Г.В., Дмитричева О.О. Оценка мутагенной активности технического продукта n-(1-этилпропил)-2,6-динитро-3,4-ксилидина. Гигиена и санитария. 2020; 99(4): 418-24</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova O., Ilyushina N., Averianova N., Masaltsev G., Dmitricheva O. Assessment of the mutagenicity of the technical product of N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2020; 99(4): 418-24. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maron D., Ames B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mut Research/Environ Mutagenesis and Related Subjects. 1983; 113 (3-4): 173-215</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maron D., Ames B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mut Research/Environ Mutagenesis and Related Subjects. 1983; 113 (3-4): 173-215.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фонштейн Л.М., Калинина Л.М., Полухина Г.Н. и Абилев С.К., Шапиро А.Л. Тест-система оценки загрязнителей среды на S. typhimurium. М.: ВИНИТИ, 1997. 52</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fonshtejn L.M., Kalinina L.M., Poluhina G.N. i Abilev S.K., Shapiro A.L. Test system for the assessment of environmental pollutants in S. typhimurium. Moscow: VINITI$ 1997, 52 .</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeiger E. Bacterial Mutation Assays. Genotoxicity Assessment. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols). 2013; 1044: 3-26</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeiger E. Bacterial Mutation Assays. Genotoxicity Assessment. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols). 2013; 1044: 3-26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Красовский Г.Н., Журков В.С., Жолдакова З.И., Фонштейн Л.М., Абилев С.А., Бобринев Е.В. и др. Методические указания по изучению мутагенной активности химических веществ при обосновании их ПДК в воде. М.: Минздрав СССР; Главное санитарно-эпидемиологическое управление. 1986. 23</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasovskij G.N., ZHurkov V.S., Zholdakova Z.I., Fonshtejn L.M., Abilev S.A., Bobrinev E.V. et al. Methodological instructive regulations on the study of mutagenicity of chemicals under justification of MAC in water. Moscow: Ministry of Health of the USSR; Main Sanitary and Epidemiological Department [Metodicheskie ukazaniya po izucheniyu mutagennoj aktivnosti khimicheskikh veshchestv pri obosnovanii ikh PDK v vode]. Moscow: Minzdrav SSSR; Glavnoe sanitarno-ehpidemiologicheskoe upravlenie. .. 1986. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamel A., Roy M., Proudlock R. The bacterial reverse mutation test. Chapter 4. In Proudlock R. Еd. Genetic Toxicology Testing. A Laboratory Manual. 2016: 79-138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamel A., Roy M., Proudlock R. The bacterial reverse mutation test. Chapter 4. In Proudlock R. Еd. Genetic Toxicology Testing. A Laboratory Manual. 2016: 79-138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mortelmans K., Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2000; 455 (1-2): 29-60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mortelmans K., Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2000; 455 (1-2): 29-60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levy D.D., Hakura A., Elespuru R.K., Escobar P.A., Kato M., Lott J. et al. Demonstrating laboratory proficiency in bacterial mutagenicity assays for regulatory submission. Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2018; 848:403075.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levy D.D, Hakura A, Elespuru R.K, Escobar P.A, Kato M, Lott J. et al. Demonstrating laboratory proficiency in bacterial mutagenicity assays for regulatory submission. Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2018; 848:403075.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bock K.W., Lipp H.P., Bock-Hennig B.S. Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes by xenobiotics. Xenobiotica. 1990; 20(11):1101-11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bock KW, Lipp HP, Bock-Hennig BS. Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes by xenobiotics. Xenobiotica. 1990; 20(11):1101-11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mori Y., Koide A., Fuwa K., Kobayashi Y.N. Benzylimidazole for preparation of S9 fraction with multi-induction of metabolizing enzymes in short-term genotoxicity assays. Mutagenesis. 2001; 16(6): 479-86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mori Y., Koide A., Fuwa K., Kobayashi Y. N. Benzylimidazole for preparation of S9 fraction with multi-induction of metabolizing enzymes in short-term genotoxicity assays. Mutagenesis. 2001; 16(6): 479-86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burke D., Wedd D., Herriott D., Bayliss M., Spalding D., Wilcox P. Evaluation of pyrazole and ethanol induced S9 fraction in bacterial mutagenicity testing. Mutagenesis. 1994; 9(1):23-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burke D, Wedd D, Herriott D, Bayliss M, Spalding D, Wilcox P. Evaluation of pyrazole and ethanol induced S9 fraction in bacterial mutagenicity testing. Mutagenesis. 1994; 9(1):23-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maron D., Katzenellenbogen J., Ames B.N. Compatibility of organic solvents with the Salmonella/microsome test. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology. 1981; 88 (4): 343-50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maron D, Katzenellenbogen J., Ames B.N. Compatibility of organic solvents with the Salmonella/microsome test. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology. 1981; 88 (4): 343-50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levy D.D., Zeiger E., Escobar P.A., Hakura A., van der Leede M. B.-J., Kato M. et. al. Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test). Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2019; 848: 403074.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levy D.D., Zeiger E., Escobar P.A., Hakura A, van der Leede M. B.-J, Kato M et. al. Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test). Mut Research/Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagenesis. 2019; 848: 403074.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егорова О.В., Демидова Ю.В., Илюшина Н.А. Оценка экспериментальных условий, влияющих на уровень спонтанных мутаций штаммов Salmonella, используемых в тесте Эймса. Гигиена и Санитария. 2021; 100(7): 736-43</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova O.V., Demidova Yu.V., Ilyushina N.A. Assessment of experimental conditions affecting spontaneous mutation level of Salmonella strains used in the Ames test. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2021;100 (7):736-43 (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline S2(R1). Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use. 2012. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/s2r1-genotoxicity-testing-and-data-interpretation-pharmaceuticals-intended-human-use</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline S2(R1). Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use. 2012. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/s2r1-genotoxicity-testing-and-data-interpretation-pharmaceuticals-intended-human-use</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
