Preview

Toxicological Review

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of cytochromes and arylhydrocarbon receptor ligands effect on aflatoxin G1 genotoxic markers

https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2025-33-5-293-305

EDN: hqjxdo

Abstract

Introduction. Aflatoxins are highly toxic metabolites produced by Aspergillus fungi, with strong carcinogenic and immunosuppressive properties. Their genotoxicity arises from the formation of reactive epoxides during metabolic activation by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 cytochrome enzymes. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) plays a critical role in regulating aflatoxin metabolism and cellular response to toxicity.

This study investigates the genotoxic effects of aflatoxin G1 (AFG1) with a focus on its interaction with CYP450 enzymes and AhR, and its impact on DNA repair and apoptosis in human hepatoma HepaRG cells.

Material and methods. Cellular toxicity of AFG1 was assessed using xCELLigence RTCA impedance analysis, which revealed an LC50 value of 9.79 µM. DNA repair activity was analyzed using the Luminex xMAP multiplex technology. The study also evaluated the effects of AhR agonists (FICZ, ITE), an antagonist (CH223191), and CYP inhibitors (α-naphthoflavone for CYP1A2, ketoconazole for CYP3A4) on AFG1-induced genotoxicity.

Results. AhR ligands exhibited moderate cytoprotective effects, increasing cell viability under AFG1 exposure. In contrast, CYP inhibitors more effectively reduced activation of DNA repair proteins. The protective role of AhR ligands may involve competitive binding with AFG₁ and modulation of downstream signaling.

Limitations. The study was conducted using a cell culture model; extrapolation of the findings to the whole organism requires consideration of toxicodynamic and toxicokinetic data.

Conclusion. These findings highlight the pivotal role of CYP enzymes and AhR in shaping the genotoxic profile of AFG₁.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require approval from a biomedical ethics committee or any other related documentation.

Authors’ contribution:
Perevoznikov I.E. – collection and processing of material, statistical processing, writing a text;
Rogovskaya N.Yu. – collection and processing of material;
Malygina D.A. – collection and processing of material;
Beltyukov P.P. – the concept and design of the study, editing;
Babakov V.N. – the concept and design of the study, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: August 21, 2025 / Accepted: October 2, 2025 / Published: November 19, 2025

About the Authors

Ilya E. Perevoznikov
Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Leningrad region, Kuzmolovsky urban settlement, 188663, Russian Federation

e-mail: ilyaperevoznikov@gmail.com



Nadezhda Yu. Rogovskaya
Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Leningrad region, Kuzmolovsky settlement, 188663, Russian Federation

e-mail: nadin-r@mail.ru



Daria A. Malygina
Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Leningrad region, Kuzmolovsky settlement, 188663, Russian Federation

e-mail: malygina.darja@yandex.ru



Petr P. Beltyukov
Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Ph.D. of Medical Sciences, leading researcher, Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Leningrad region, Kuzmolovsky settlement, 188663, Russian Federation

e-mail: beltiukov@gpech.ru



Vladimir N. Babakov
Scientific Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation

Ph.D. of Biological Sciences, head of the laboratory No. 63, Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Leningrad region, Kuzmolovsky settlement, 188663, Russian Federation

e-mail: babakov@gpech.ru



References

1. Li T., Zhang Z., Wang Y., Li Y., Zhu J., Hu R., Yang Y., Liu M. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis for High- and Low-Aflatoxin-Yield Aspergillus flavus Strains Isolated From Natural Environments. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:741875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.741875

2. Kumar P., Mahato D.K., Kamle M., Mohanta T.K., Kang S.G. Aflatoxins: A Global Concern for Food Safety, Human Health and Their Management. Front. Microbiol. 2017; 7: 2170.

3. Klvana M., Bren U. Aflatoxin B1–Formamidopyrimidine DNA Adducts: Relationships between Structures, Free Energies, and Melting Temperatures. Molecules. 2019; 24(1): 150.

4. Bbosa G.S., Kitya D., Lubega A., Ogwal-Okeng J., Anokbonggo W.W., Kyegombe D.B. Review of the Biological and Health Effects of Aflatoxins on Body Organs and Body Systems. In: Aflatoxins-Recent Advances and Future Prospects. 2013: 239–65. https://doi.org/10.5772/51201

5. Liu Y., Wu F. Global burden of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma: A risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010; 118(6): 818–24.

6. Benkerroum N. Chronic and Acute Toxicities of Aflatoxins: Mechanisms of Action. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(2): 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020423

7. Dai C., Tian E., Hao Z., Tang S., Wang Z., Sharma G., Jiang H., Shen J. Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity and Protective Effects of Curcumin: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11(10): 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11102031

8. Малыгина Д.А., Роговская Н.Ю., Бельтюков П.П., Бабаков В.Н. Роль цитохромов CYP1A и CYP3A в генотоксическом действии бенз(а)пирена. Токсикологический вестник. 2022; 30(3): 158–66. https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2022-30-3-158-166 https://elibrary.ru/edtxma

9. Arenas-Huertero F., Zaragoza-Ojeda M., Sánchez-Alarcón J., Milić M., Šegvić Klarić M., Montiel-González J.M., Valencia-Quintana R. Involvement of Ahr Pathway in Toxicity of Aflatoxins and Other Mycotoxins. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10: 2347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02347

10. Levine-Fridman A., Chen L., Elferink C.J. Cytochrome P4501A1 promotes G1 phase cell cycle progression by controlling aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004; 65(2): 461–9. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.65.2.461

11. Kolluri S.K., Weiss C., Koff A., Gottlicher M. p27Kip1 induction and inhibition of proliferation by the intracellular Ah receptor in developing thymus and hepatoma cells. Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 1742–53.

12. Elizondo G., Fernandez-Salguero P., Sheikh M.S., et al. Altered cell cycle control at the G2/M phases in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-null embryo fibroblast. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000; 57: 1056–63.

13. Niida H., Nakanishi M. DNA damage checkpoints in mammals. Mutagenesis. 2006; 21(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gei063

14. Benkerroum N. Aflatoxins: Producing-Molds, Structure, Health Issues and Incidence in Southeast Asian and Sub-Saharan African Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4): 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041215

15. Kuilman M.E., Maas R.F., Fink-Gremmels J. Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism and cytotoxicity of aflatoxin B(1) in bovine hepatocytes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2000; 14(4): 321–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-2333(00)00025-4

16. Jossé R., Aninat C., Glaise D., Dumont J., Fessard V., Morel F., Poul J.M., Guguen-Guillouzo C., Guillouzo A. Long-term functional stability of human HepaRG hepatocytes and use for chronic toxicity and genotoxicity studies. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008; 36(6):1111–8. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.107.019901

17. Ye G., Gao H., Zhang X., Liu X., Chen J., Liao X., Zhang H., Huang Q. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates benzo[a]pyrene-induced metabolic reprogramming in human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 756: 144130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144130

18. Zhu Q., Ma Y., Liang J., et al. AHR mediates the aflatoxin B1 toxicity associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021; 6(1): 299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00713-1

19. Zhang X., Lu J., He B., Tang L., Liu X., Zhu D., Cao H., Wang Y., Li L. A tryptophan derivative, ITE, enhances liver cell metabolic functions in vitro. Int J Mol Med. 2017; 39(1): 101–12. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2825

20. Zhang Z., Lu H., Huan F., et al. Cytochrome P450 2A13 mediates the neoplastic transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells at a low concentration of aflatoxin B1. Int. J. Cancer. 2014; 134(7): 1539–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28489

21. Bonomo S., Jørgensen F.S., Olsen L. Dissecting the Cytochrome P450 1A2- and 3A4-Mediated Metabolism of Aflatoxin B1 in Ligand and Protein Contributions. Chemistry. 2017; 23(12): 2884–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20160509


Review

For citations:


Perevoznikov I.E., Rogovskaya N.Yu., Malygina D.A., Beltyukov P.P., Babakov V.N. Evaluation of cytochromes and arylhydrocarbon receptor ligands effect on aflatoxin G1 genotoxic markers. Toxicological Review. 2025;33(5):293-305. https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2025-33-5-293-305. EDN: hqjxdo

Views: 145


ISSN 0869-7922 (Print)
ISSN 3034-4611 (Online)