ASSESSMENT OF CARCINOGENIC RISK TO PUBLIC HEALTH WHEN USING GROUNDWATER WITH HIGH ARSENIC CONTENT AS SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN
https://doi.org/10.36946/0869-7922-2019-6-39-44
Abstract
Hygienic assessment of drinking groundwater used for drinking water supply by the population of the Northern part of the Republic of Dagestan for several decades has been carried out. The content of arsenic in drinking water sources was found to be up to 50 times higher than the permissible WHO standard. The use of regional factors of water consumption allowed to calculate individual and population carcinogenic risks to the population during long-term use of groundwater for drinking water supply. It was shown that the individual carcinogenic risk was 4,3E-4 at the minimum concentration of 0,01 mg/L; 2,1E-2 at the maximum concentration of 0,5 mg/L, and 6,0E-3 at the average value of 0,14 mg/L, respectively. The identified levels of lifetime individual carcinogenic risks (over 70 years) exceed the «acceptable» (target) level of 10-5 and are assessed as unacceptable for the preservation of public health. For the exposed population of the studied regions of Northern Dagestan (309,7 thousand) the values of population annual carcinogenic risks, reflecting the additional (to the background) number of cases of malignant neoplasms that can occur during the year, ranged from 1 to 95 cases. The results of this study allowed to identify areas with high levels of arsenic in drinking water and to identify the exposed part of the population for the implementation of measures to reduce the risk. To assess the population’s exposure and establish a link between exposure to arsenic and its accumulation in humans, the biomonitoring has been conducted, the results of which allowed to identify the correlation between arsenic content in hair of residents and it’s exhibited content in consumed drinking water.
About the Author
T. O. Abdulmutalimova
Institute of Geology of the Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
367030, Makhachkala
Russian Federation
367030, Makhachkala
References
1. Kurbanov M. K. Geothermal and hydromineral resources of the Eastern Caucasus and the Caucasus. – M.: Nauka, MAIK “Nauka / Interperiodika”, 2001. - 260 p. (in Russian).
2. Kurbanov M. K. North Dagestan artesian basin. Makhachkala: Dagknigizdat, 1969. – 92 p. (in Russian).
3. Shagoyants S. A. Underground waters of the Central and Eastern parts of the North Caucasus and conditions of their formation. - M.: Gosgeoltekhizdat, 1959. - 306 p. (in Russian).
4. Hall A. H. Chronic arsenic poisoning. Toxicol. Lett., 2002. - No. 128. – Pp. 69-72.
5. Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS): description of a multidisciplinary epidemiologic investigation. Ahsan H. et al. J. Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol., 2006. - V. 16. – Pp. 191 – 205.
6. Nordstrom D. K.: Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science, 2002. - No. 296. – Pp. 2143 - 2145.
7. Avtsyn A. P. et al. Human trace elements. - M.: Medicine, 1991. – 496 p. (in Russian).
8. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). A Review of Human Carcinogens: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. Lyon: World Health Organization Press. - 2012. – 527 p. - Available at: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/
9. Avaliani S.L., Balbus J., Golub A.A. et al. Environmental management based on risk analysis methodology. - Higher School of Economics. Moscow: TEIs. 2010. - 215 p. (in Russian).
10. Avaliani S.L., Bezpal’ko L.E., Bobkova T.E., Mishina A.L. Perspective directions of development of risk analysis methodology in Russia. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2013. - No. 1.- Pp. 33-35. (in Russian).
11. Avaliani S.L., Novikov S.M., Shashina T.A., Dodina N.S., Kislitsyn V.A., Mishina A.L. Problems of improvement of the environmental quality management system on the basis of risk analysis to public health. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2014. - No. 6. – Pp. 5-8. (in Russian).
12. Avaliani S.L., Revich B.A., Zakharov V.M. Monitoring of human health and environmental health (Regional environmental policy). – M.: Center for environmental policy of Russia, 2001.-76 p. (in Russian).
13. Egorova N.A., Krasovsky G.N. Harmonization of hygienic standards with foreign requirements for drinking water quality. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2005. - No. 2. - Pp. 10 - 13. (in Russian).
14. Novikov S.M., Shashina T.A., Khamidulina Kh.Kh., Skvortsova N.S., Ungureanu T.N., Ivanova S.V. Actual problems in the system of state regulation of chemical safety. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2013. - No. 4. - Pp. 19-23. (in Russian).
15. Current problems in assessment of risks and damages to health from exposure to environmental factors. Novikov S. M. et al. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2007. - No. 5. - Pp. 18-20. (in Russian).
16. Novikov S.M., Fokin M.V., Ungureanu T.N. Actual issues of methodology and development of evidence - based assessment of public health risk when exposed to chemicals. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2016. - No. 8. - Pp. 711-716. (in Russian).
17. Rakhmanin Yu.A. et. al. Assessment of damage to human health as one of the priority areas of human ecology and a tool to justify management decisions. Hygiene and Sanitation, 2006. - No. 5. – Pp. 10 – 13. (in Russian).
18. ISO 17278-2:2014 Water quality – Determination of arsenic and antimony - Part 2: Method using hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS).
19. International standards for drinkingwater. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO. - 1971. - 70p.
20. Health standards. Maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of chemicals in the water of water bodies of drinking and cultural water use. GN 2.1.5.1315-03 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Abdulmutalimova T.O. ASSESSMENT OF CARCINOGENIC RISK TO PUBLIC HEALTH WHEN USING GROUNDWATER WITH HIGH ARSENIC CONTENT AS SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER SUPPLY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF DAGESTAN. Toxicological Review. 2019;(6):39-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36946/0869-7922-2019-6-39-44
Views:
730
Email this article 