The influence of a person’s psychoemotional status on the peculiarities of odor perception in atmospheric air: olfacto-odorimetric studies
https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2025-33-6-457-466
EDN: gageed
Abstract
Introduction. The analysis of a person’s psychoemotional state as one of the parameters of adaptive reaction of organism to external sensory stimulation, as well as important component which influence on the peculiarities of this reaction, have a great importance for assessing the risk of adverse effects of atmospheric air pollution by substances with olfactory effects.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of individual psychoemotional parameters on perception of odors of various hedonic tones in olfactory-odorimetric experiments.
Material and methods. Various concentrations of the selected flavors (“Orange”, “Cognac” and “Coffee”) were delivered to the study participants using the ECOMA T08 olfactometer dilution system. The composition of the supplied mixtures was controlled by chromatography-mass spectrometry. The emotional state of the participants and its changes during odorimetry were performed using standard validated psychological and psychophysiological scales.
Results. The study showed that when exposed to an odor characterized as pleasant, positive and statistically significant changes in the well–being of the study participants were observed (p1–3 = 0.043, p1–2 = 0.016), as well as increased activity when exposed to threshold concentrations. Exposure to high concentrations (above threshold), regardless of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor, is in most cases associated with a decrease in activity and a deterioration in mood. It has been established that the peculiarities of odor perception (sensitivity, perceived intensity) are significantly influenced by a person’s emotional state and quality of life indicators (degree of fatigue, self-assessment of health, level of interpersonal relationships).
Limitations. The studies were conducted under conditions of short-term controlled odorant supply, which makes it difficult to extrapolate the results to the natural conditions of atmospheric air pollution with odorous substances.
Conclusion. The conducted research, as an experimental model of a real situation, has high social significance, since increased emotional stress, which can develop when exposed to annoying environmental odors, is a prerequisite for the development of many diseases, in particular, of the neuro-immune-endocrine system, of which it is the trigger.
Compliance with ethical standards. The consent of the local ethics committee of the Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Medical and Biological Health Risks of the FMBA was obtained for conducting the research (Protocol No. 3 dated 08/17/2020). All participants gave informed voluntary written consent to participate in the study.
Authors’ contribution:
Budarina O.V. – concept and design of the study, writing the text, editing;
Ingel F.I. – concept and design of the study, writing the text, editing;
Skovronskaya S.A. – collection and processing of material, writing text, editing.
All co-authors are responsible for approving the final version of the article and ensuring the integrity of all parts of the article.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare that there are no obvious and potential conflicts of interest in connection with the publication of this article.
Funding. The study was carried out within the framework of the state task No. 1023032300263-5-3.3.5.
Received: November 20, 2025 / Accepted: November 25, 2025 / Published: January 15, 2026
About the Authors
Olga V. BudarinaРоссия
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Researcher at the Department of Public Health Risk Analysis, Federal Research Center for Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of Rospotrebnadzor, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: budarina.ov@fncg.ru
Faina I. Ingel
Россия
Doctor of Biology, Leading Researcher at the Department of Preventive Toxicology and Biomedical Research, Federal State Budgetary Institution Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Risks to Health, Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Moscow, 119121, Russian Federation
e-mail: fainaingel@mail.ru
Svetlana A. Skovronskaya
Россия
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Department of Public Health Risk Analysis, Federal Research Center for Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman” of Rospotrebnadzor Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation
e-mail: sko_sveta@mail.ru
References
1. Winnecke G., Neuf M. Psychological reaction to sensory irritation by environmental stress factors: personal or situational? In: International Conference «Topical Issues of Odor Assessment and Regulation»: Collection of Reports [Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Aktual’nye voprosy otsenki i regulirovaniya zapakha»: Sbornik dokladov]. Moscow; 2006: 269–80. (in Russian)
2. Odours and Human Health. Edmonton, Alberta; 2017. Available at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/9781460131534
3. Guadalupe-Fernandez V., Sario M., Vecchi S., Michelozzi P., Davoli M., Ancona C. Industrial odour pollution and human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Health. 2021; 20(1): 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00774-3
4. Ivanova S.V., Skovronskaya S.A., Goshin M.E., Budarina O.V., Kulikova A.Z. The study of the odour impact on physiological, emotional, and cognitive aspects of human health under experimental conditions (literature review). Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(12): 1370–5. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-12-1370-1375 https://elibrary.ru/jzuuhx (in Russian)
5. Ingel F.I., Budarina O.V., Akhaltseva L.V. Impact of odour with high annoyance potential on human feeling, activity, and mood in odorimetric studies. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2021; 100(6): 560–7. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-6-560-567 https://elibrary.ru/ancbsn (in Russian)
6. Gaby J.M., Tepper B.J. A comparison of hedonic and emotional responses to common odors delivered by qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices) and traditional sniff jars. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020; 80: 103804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103804
7. Tong C., Ding Y., Wai A.A.P., Chua H.X.J., Wu X., JunLiang Lim K., et al. Decoding olfactory response from neurophysiological signal with a multi modal deep learning framework. Neural Netw. 2025; 191: 107775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107775
8. Villemure C., Laferriere A.C., Bushnell M.C. The ventral striatum is implicated in the analgesic effect of mood changes. Pain Res. Manag. 2012; 17(2): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/371362
9. Sayorwan W., Siripornpanich V., Piriyapunyaporn T., Hongratanaworakit T., Kotchabhakdi N., Ruangrungsi N. The effects of lavender oil inhalation on emotional states, autonomic nervous system, and brain electrical activity. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2012; 95(4): 598–606.
10. Murnane S.S., Lehocky A.H., Owens P.D., eds. Odor Thresholds for Chemicals with Established Occupational Health Standards. American Industrial Hygiene Association; 2019.
11. Air quality – Determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. EN 13725:2003. European committee for standardisation; 2003.
12. Ingel F., Krivtsova E., Urtseva N., Legostaeva T. Children’s, adult’s and family’s emotional stress in context of genomic instability. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2018; 6(6): 48–65. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.66005
13. Budarina O.V., Sabirova Z.F., Skovronskaya S.A., Dodina N.S., Kokhan A.A, Malysheva A.G. Comprehensive hygienic assessment of ambient air pollution in the area of food and processing industry enterprises’ location. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2024; 103(3): 198–207. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-3-198-207 https://elibrary.ru/dkrspg (in Russian)
14. Pelosi P. On the Scent: A Journey through the Science of Smell. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
15. Pause B.M., Zoil S.M. It’s All About the Smell [Vse delo v zapakhe]. Moscow: Diskurs; 2021. (in Russian)
16. Budarina O.V. Scientific substantiation of modern hygienic bases of rationing, control and evaluation of odour in the atmospheric air of populated areas: Diss. Moscow; 2020. https://elibrary.ru/gfxxuy (in Russian)
17. Ryazanov V.A. Sanitary Protection of Atmospheric Air [Sanitarnaya okhrana atmosfernogo vozdukha]. Moscow: Medgiz; 1954. (in Russian)
18. Leger K.A., Gloger E.M, Maras J., Marshburn C.K. Discrimination and health: The mediating role of daily stress processes. Health Psychol. 2022; 41(5): 332–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001173
19. Kaur A., Charles S.T., Molina K.M, Almeida D.M. Adding insult to injury: everyday discrimination moderates stressor-related negative affect. Behav. Med. 2024; 50(1): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2022.2092441
20. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. Available at: https://who.int/tools/whoqol
Review
For citations:
Budarina O.V., Ingel F.I., Skovronskaya S.A. The influence of a person’s psychoemotional status on the peculiarities of odor perception in atmospheric air: olfacto-odorimetric studies. Toxicological Review. 2025;33(6):457-466. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2025-33-6-457-466. EDN: gageed
JATS XML





























