Recent experimental data on toxic effects of sulfur dioxide (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2026-34-4-273-284
EDN: zpqwdh
Abstract
Sulfur dioxide is one of the most common anthropogenic air pollutants, posing a significant hazard to human health, especially in industrial regions.
The aim of this literature review is to summarize and systematize recent experimental data on the mechanisms and toxic effects of sulfur dioxide and its water-soluble derivatives (sulfite and bisulfite ions) in in vivo and in vitro models.
Based on the analysis of 64 publications selected from international and Russian databases, this review provides a detailed description of toxicokinetics and key pathogenetic pathways. We established that the leading mechanisms of toxicity include the induction of intense oxidative stress, a systemic proinflammatory response through NF-κB activation, and profound disruption of cellular energy metabolism due to mitochondrial dysfunction.
This review describes systemic toxic effects of sulfur dioxide, extending beyond its direct irritant effect on the respiratory tract. Evidence is presented of damage to the cardiovascular system (cardiomyocyte apoptosis and structural myocardial changes), nervous system (neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal apoptosis), and reproductive function (impaired spermatogenesis, damage to the blood-testis barrier, and ovarian suppression). In addition, the genotoxic potential of sulfur dioxide and its role in disrupting cellular energy homeostasis are discussed. The findings expand our understanding of the fundamental principles of sulfur dioxide toxicity.
Author contributions:
Bateneva V.A., Nikogosyan K.M., Slobodchikova A.S. – data collection and analysis, draft manuscript preparation;
Minigalieva I.A. – goal formulation, approval of the final version;
Rybina T.M. – data collection and analysis.
All co-authors are responsible for approving the final version of the article and ensuring the integrity of all its parts
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest in connection with the publication of this article.
Funding. The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interest in connection with the publication of this article.
Received: March 2, 2026 / Revised: June 3, 2026 / Accepted: August 3, 2026 / Published: September 16, 2026
About the Authors
Vlada A. BatenevaRussian Federation
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Industrial Toxicology, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation
e-mail: ilzira-minigalieva@yandex.ru
Ilzira A. Minigalieva
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Biology), Head of the Department of Toxicology and Bioprophylaxis, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation
e-mail: ilzira-minigalieva@yandex.ru
Karen M. Nikogosyan
Russian Federation
Researcher, Laboratory of Scientific Foundations of Bioprophylaxis, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation
e-mail: nikoghosyankm@ymrc.ru
Alexandra S. Slobodchikova
Russian Federation
Research Assistant, Laboratory of Industrial Toxicology, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection of Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation
e-mail: slobodchikovaas@ymrc.ru
Tatsyana M. Rybina
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Pulmonology, Phthisiology, Allergology, and Occupational Pathology with a Course in Advanced Training and Professional Development, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, 220045, Republic of Belarus; Director of the LLC “Scientific and Practical Center MedEveri”, Minsk, 220113, Republic of Belarus
e-mail: tanya-rybina@list.ru
References
1. Smith S.J., Pitcher H., Wigley T.M.L. Global and regional anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions. Glob. Planet. Change. 2001; 29(1-2): 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00057-6 https://elibrary.ru/anhwuh
2. Syomin P.O. Official information on sulfur dioxide emissions and its assessment using satellite remote sensing data. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2022; 13(4): 1111–33. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.417 https://elibrary.ru/igmlas (in Russian)
3. Zhou L., Lao Z., Fan X., Hao M., Yang Y. Sulfur dioxide derivatives aggravated ovalbumin-induced asthma through targeting TRPV1 and tight junctions. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2023; 87(6): 627–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/bbb/zbad039 https://elibrary.ru/juaxdw
4. Wright N., Newell K., Chan K.H., Gilbert S., Hacker A., Lu Y., et al. Long-term ambient air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory disease in China: Findings from a prospective cohort study. Environ. Health. 2023; 22(1): 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00978-9 https://elibrary.ru/abnnae
5. Li L., Yang J., Song Y.F., Chen P.Y., Ou C.Q. The burden of COPD mortality due to ambient air pollution in Guangzhou, China. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 25900. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25900 https://elibrary.ru/wptoch
6. Nie A., Meng Z. Sulfur dioxide derivative modulation of potassium channels in rat ventricular myocytes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005; 442(2): 187–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.08.004
7. Chen M.C., Wang C.F., Lai B.C., Hsieh S.W., Chen S.C., Hung C.H., et al. Air pollution is associated with poor cognitive function in Taiwanese adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(1): 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010316 https://elibrary.ru/ddtejx
8. Chen Y.A., Chang Y.K., Su Y.R., Chang H.C. Ambient sulfur dioxide could have an impact on testicular volume from a observational study on a population of infertile male. BMC Urol. 2020; 20(1): 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00710-6 https://elibrary.ru/lmftcj
9. Zhou N., Cui Z., Yang S., Han X., Chen G., Zhou Z., et al. Air pollution and decreased semen quality: a comparative study of Chongqing urban and rural areas. Environ. Pollut. 2014; 187: 145–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.030
10. Wang D., Wan M., Cheng N., Zheng T., Hu X., Li H., et al. Sulfur dioxide exposure and other factors affecting age at natural menopause in the Jinchuan cohort. Climacteric. 2015; 18(5): 722–32. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2015.1015514
11. Arachchige D.L., Dwivedi S.K., Olowolagba A.M., Peters J., Beatty A.C., Guo A., et al. Dynamic insights into mitochondrial function: Monitoring viscosity and SO2 levels in living cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2024; 258: 112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2024.112986 https://elibrary.ru/aadawh
12. Song A., Lin F., Li J., Liao Q., Liu E., Jiang X., et al. Bisulfite and sulfite as derivatives of sulfur dioxide alters biomechanical behaviors of airway smooth muscle cells in culture. Inhal. Toxicol. 2014; 26(3): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.872211
13. Wang X., Zhao Y., Shi X., Gong M., Hao Y., Fu Y., et al. Sulfur dioxide derivatives attenuates consolidation of contextual fear memory in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2022; 914: 174658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174658 https://elibrary.ru/qqgaiq
14. Liu X., Zhou H., Zhang H., Jin H., He Y. Advances in the research of sulfur dioxide and pulmonary hypertension. Front. Pharmacol. 2023; 14: 1282403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1282403 https://elibrary.ru/fhmkgm
15. Stipanuk M.H. Metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids: how the body copes with excess methionine, cysteine, and sulfide. J. Nutr. 2020; 150(Suppl. 1): 2494S–505S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa094 https://elibrary.ru/bakoyd
16. Dahl A.R., Felicetti S.A., Muggenburg B.A. Clearance of sulfuric acid-introduced 35S from the respiratory tracts of rats, guinea pigs and dogs following inhalation or instillation. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1983; 3(4): 293–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-0590(83)80142-0 https://elibrary.ru/iwmcuz
17. Chen S., Huang Y., Liu Z., Yu W., Zhang H., Li K., et al. Sulphur dioxide suppresses inflammatory response by sulphenylating NF-κB p65 at Cys38 in a rat model of acute lung injury. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2017; 131(21): 2655–70. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20170274
18. Song Y., Peng H., Bu D., Ding X., Yang F., Zhu Z., et al. Negative auto-regulation of sulfur dioxide generation in vascular endothelial cells: AAT1 S-sulfenylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020; S0006-291X(20)30306-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.040 https://elibrary.ru/spdons
19. Meng Z., Qin G., Zhang B., Geng H., Bai Q., Bai W., et al. Oxidative damage of sulfur dioxide inhalation on lungs and hearts of mice. Environ. Res. 2003; 93(3): 285–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-9351(03)00045-8
20. Meng Z., Bai W. Oxidation damage of sulfur dioxide on testicles of mice. Environ. Res. 2004; 96(3): 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.04.008
21. Wu S., Zhang X., Lu Y., Ma Y., Qi X., Wang X., et al. SO2 derivatives impair ovarian function by inhibiting Serpine1/NF-κB pathway-mediated ovarian granulosa cell survival. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025; 487: 137116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137116 https://elibrary.ru/pqsnce
22. Murad W., Singh R., Yen T.Y. An efficient algorithmic approach for mass spectrometry-based disulfide connectivity determination using multi-ion analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12(Suppl. 1): S12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S1-S12
23. Высочина И.В., Константинова И.К., Скворцова Н.Н. Влияние сернистого газа на гликогенолиз в легких и печени. Гигиена и санитария. 1974; 53(4): 3–6.
24. Li R., Meng Z. Effects of SO2 derivatives on expressions of MUC5AC and IL-13 in human bronchial epithelial cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2007; 81(12): 867–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-007-0212-7 https://elibrary.ru/curtuh
25. Qin G., Meng Z. Effects of sulfur dioxide derivatives on expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in human bronchial epithelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009; 47(4): 734–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.01.005
26. Meng Z., Liu Y., Wu D. Effect of sulfur dioxide inhalation on cytokine levels in lungs and serum of mice. Inhal. Toxicol. 2005; 17(6): 303–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370590922625
27. Meng Z., Liu Y. Cell morphological ultrastructural changes in various organs from mice exposed by inhalation to sulfur dioxide. Inhal. Toxicol. 2007; 19(6–7): 543–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370701271373
28. Qin G., Wang J., Sang N. Sulfur dioxide inhibits expression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation genes encoded by both nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA in rat lungs. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017; 24(3): 2527–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7859-7 https://elibrary.ru/gzrpkg
29. Sueyoshi S., Miyata Y., Masumoto Y., Ishibashi Y., Matsuzawa S., Harano N., et al. Reduced airway inflammation and remodeling in parallel with mucin 5AC protein expression decreased by s-carboxymethylcysteine, a mucoregulant, in the airways of rats exposed to sulfur dioxide. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2004; 134(4): 273–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079164
30. Bai J., Meng Z. Effects of sulfur dioxide on apoptosis-related gene expressions in lungs from rats. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005; 43(3): 272–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.09.002
31. Riedel F., Krämer M., Scheibenbogen C., Rieger C.H. Effects of SO2 exposure on allergic sensitization in the guinea pig. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1988; 82(4): 527–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(88)90961-x
32. Park J.K., Kim Y.K., Lee S.R., Cho S.H., Min K.U., Kim Y.Y. Repeated exposure to low levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2) enhances the development of ovalbumin-induced asthmatic reactions in guinea pigs. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001; 86(1): 62–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62358-7
33. Li S., Xu Z., Xia J., Qin G., Sang N. Sulfur dioxide induces apoptosis via reactive oxygen species generation in rat cardiomyocytes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019; 26(9): 8758–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04319-7 https://elibrary.ru/bpakcs
34. Qin G., Wu M., Wang J., Xu Z., Xia J., Sang N. Sulfur dioxide contributes to the cardiac and mitochondrial dysfunction in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2016; 151(2): 334–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfw048
35. Woerman A.L., Mendelowitz D. Perinatal sulfur dioxide exposure alters brainstem parasympathetic control of heart rate. Cardiovasc Res. 2013; 99(1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvt057
36. Zhang J., Li Z., Qie M., Zheng R., Shetty J., Wang J. Sodium fluoride and sulfur dioxide affected male reproduction by disturbing blood-testis barrier in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016; 94: 103–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.05.017
37. Li X., Yi H., Wang H. Sulphur dioxide and arsenic affect male reproduction via interfering with spermatogenesis in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018; 165: 164–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.109
38. Zhang B., Liu C.Y., Meng Z.Q. Study of toxicity on male reproductive system of mice induced by SO2 inhalation. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2005; 34(2): 167–9. (in Chinese)
39. Zhang J., Zheng F., Liang C., Zhu Y., Shi Y., Han Y., et al. Sulfur dioxide inhalation lowers sperm quality and alters testicular histology via increasing expression of CREM and ACT proteins in rat testes. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016; 47: 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2016.09.001
40. Sang N., Yun Y., Yao G.Y., Li H.Y., Guo L., Li G.K. SO(2)-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by cyclooxygenases-2-derived prostaglandin E(2) and its downstream signaling pathway in rat hippocampal neurons. Toxicol. Sci. 2011; 124(2): 400–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr224
41. Yun Y., Yao G., Yue H., Guo L., Qin G., Li G., et al. SO(2) inhalation causes synaptic injury in rat hippocampus via its derivatives in vivo. Chemosphere. 2013; 93(10): 2426–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.063
42. Yun Y., Li H., Li G., Sang N. SO2 inhalation modulates the expression of apoptosis-related genes in rat hippocampus via its derivatives in vivo. Inhal. Toxicol. 2010; 22(11): 919–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2010.494694
43. Kilic D. The effects of ageing and sulfur dioxide inhalation exposure on visual-evoked potentials, antioxidant enzyme systems, and lipid-peroxidation levels of the brain and eye. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2003; 25(5): 587–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-0362(03)00090-4
44. Yargicoglu P., Sahin E., Gümüşlü S., Ağar A. The effect of sulfur dioxide inhalation on active avoidance learning, antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation during aging. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2007; 29(2): 211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2006.11.002
45. Grings M., Moura A.P., Amaral A.U., Parmeggiani B., Gasparotto J., Moreira J.C., et al. Sulfite disrupts brain mitochondrial energy homeostasis and induces mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening via thiol group modification. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014; 1842(9): 1413–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.04.022 https://elibrary.ru/uvzlbl
46. Kotova E.A., Antonenko Yu.N. Fifty years of research on protonophores: mitochondrial uncoupling as a basis for therapeutic action. Acta Naturae. 2022; 14(1): 4–13. https://doi.org/10.32607/actanaturae.11610 https://elibrary.ru/fwkqlo
47. Zorova L.D., Pevzner I.B., Khailova L.S., Korshunova G.A., Kovaleva M.A., Kovalev L.I., et al. Mitochondrial ATP synthase and mild uncoupling by butyl ester of rhodamine 19, C4R1. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023; 12(3): 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030646 https://elibrary.ru/xdnswi
48. Huang Y., Tang C., Du J., Jin H. Endogenous sulfur dioxide: a new member of gasotransmitter family in the cardiovascular system. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016; 2016: 8961951. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8961951
49. Mailloux R.J. Targeted redox regulation α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex for the treatment of human diseases. Cells. 2025; 14(9): 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14090653 https://elibrary.ru/pvyvwt
50. Tossounian M.A., Zhang B., Gout I. The writers, readers, and erasers in redox regulation of GAPDH. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020; 9(12): 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9121288 https://elibrary.ru/outfrp
51. Li K., Geng Y., Lin B., Xi Z. Molecular mechanisms underlying mitochondrial damage, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and oxidative stress induced by environmental pollutants. Toxicol. Res. (Camb.) 2023; 12(6): 1014–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfad094 https://elibrary.ru/iqgwtb
52. Phaniendra A., Jestadi D.B., Periyasamy L. Free radicals: properties, sources, targets, and their implication in various diseases. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2015; 30(1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-014-0446-0
53. Wang Y., Luo W., Wang Y. PARP-1 and its associated nucleases in DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst.). 2019; 81: 102651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102651 https://elibrary.ru/sdoeha
54. Moura R.D., Mattos P.D., Valente P.F., Hoch N.C. Molecular mechanisms of cell death by parthanatos: More questions than answers. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2024; 47(Suppl. 1): e20230357. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2023-0357 https://elibrary.ru/kmuxlz
55. Lv B., Peng H., Qiu B., Zhang L., Ge M., Bu D., et al. Sulphenylation of CypD at cysteine 104: a novel mechanism by which SO2 inhibits cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022; 9: 784799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.784799 https://elibrary.ru/xvbuav
56. Lai Y., Gao F.F., Ge R.T., Liu R., Ma S., Liu X. Metal ions overloading and cell death. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2024; 40(1): 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09910-4 https://elibrary.ru/hkafpt
57. Gonzalez Herrera K.N., Lee J., Haigis M.C. Intersections between mitochondrial sirtuin signaling and tumor cell metabolism. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015; 50(3): 242–55. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2015.1031879
58. Nguyen T.T., Wei S., Nguyen T.H., Jo Y., Zhang Y., Park W., et al. Mitochondria-associated programmed cell death as a therapeutic target for age-related disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023; 55(8): 1595–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-023-01046-5 https://elibrary.ru/ebemot
Review
For citations:
Bateneva V.A., Minigalieva I.A., Nikogosyan K.M., Slobodchikova A.S., Rybina T.M. Recent experimental data on toxic effects of sulfur dioxide (literature review). Toxicological Review. 2026;34(4):273-284. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2026-34-4-273-284. EDN: zpqwdh
JATS XML





























