COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO RISK ASSESSMENT AND HYGIENE REGULATION OF NANOMATERIALS IN RUSSIA AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION (ON EXAMPLE OF NORWAY)
https://doi.org/10.36946/0869-7922-2016-6-31-35
Abstract
Approaches to risk assessment when working with nanoparticles and nanomaterials in the European Union countries and the Russian Federation are in principle similar. No specific procedures for risk assessment are provided for working with nanoparticles and nanomaterials. All approaches are based on using the same methods and techniques as for assessment of substances in the micro or macro form(except nanofibers). However approaches to hygiene regulation differ to some extent from country to country. Those differences are examined in detail in the present article.
About the Authors
A. V. Glushkova
Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. S. Radilov
ФГУП «НИИ гигиены, профпатологии и экологии человека» ФМБА России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Dulov
Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. S. Khlebnikova
Research Institute of Hygiene, Occupational Pathology and Human Ecology, Federal Medical Biological Agency
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Анциферова И.В. Оценка рисков на протяжении жизненного цикла производства наноматериалов // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015; 2-1; URL: URL:http://www.science-education.ru/ru/ article/view?id=20357 (дата обращения: 13.08.2016).
2. https://osha.europa.eu/en/topics/ riskassessment
3. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ chemicals/nanotech/pdf/jrc_report.pdf
4. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:275:0038:0 040:EN:PDF
5. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/ chemicals/reach/index_en.html
6. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ chemicals/nanotech/pdf/jrc_report.pdf
7. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives
8. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/ forskrift/2008-05-30-516
9. https://lovdata.no/dokument/ SF/forskrift/2012-06-16- 622?q=merking+klassifisering
10. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives
11. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives
12. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives/the-osh-framework-directive
13. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives/exposure-to-chemical-agentsandchemicalsafety/osh-directives/75
14. https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/ directives/exposure-to-chemical-agentsandchemicalsafety/
15. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/ chemicals/reach/nanomaterials/index_ en.htm
16. http://web.ion.ru/GM_1/GM.asp
17. http://fp.crc.ru/
18. http://www.rusnanonet.ru/products/ list/
19. http://www.rusnanonet.ru/goods/
20. http://www.portalnano.ru/
Review
For citations:
Glushkova A.V., Radilov A.S., Dulov S.A., Khlebnikova N.S. COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO RISK ASSESSMENT AND HYGIENE REGULATION OF NANOMATERIALS IN RUSSIA AND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION (ON EXAMPLE OF NORWAY). Toxicological Review. 2016;(6):31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36946/0869-7922-2016-6-31-35
Views:
1194
Email this article 